Another day, another video by a flerf. This one was sent to me by someone who posts on Facebook under the name Sean Angelo Mchugh. Its name shows up on Facebook as "Nasatan exposed part 1". He also sent me a part 2, which may get its own post, and added "They are my videos so they don’t give opinions rather just raw facts" and went on to say that these facts are "all referenced".
Let's start by seeing if these are his videos. I didn't find any photos of him, just memes on his Facebook profile, but his About page on Facebook says that he works at ARTSTOPSeany and Sean Angelo Mchugh artist and both of those have photos of possibly the same person
The YouTube channel the video is on is called CUBESMASHER and the description on the channel's About page says "Exposing the lies of the luciferian Freemasons". There's no name, but the person speaking in the video is on screen most of the time, and this does seem to be the same person.
And this also appears to be the same person in this article, Artist Sean Angelo McHugh vows to clear his name after being charged with historic child sex abuse but since we're not meeting him in person, let's leave that for the courts to decide.
This is not the former American football player Sean McHugh or the accused US Capitol rioter, whose trial seems to be ongoing, I found details about him in Inside the Statutory Rape Conviction and Domestic Violence History of the Accused U.S. Capitol Rioter Who Taunted Cops as ‘Protecting Pedophiles’ and California Man Accused of Unleashing Can of Bear Spray on Cops Loses Bid to Move Jan. 6 Case from D.C. to Wolverine State
But back to Sean the flat-earther. Let's watch his video.
As I write this it's got ten likes and 377 views, so maybe all he wanted from me is more views. He's "absolutely gobsmacked" that anyone would believe NASA, who, he says have been repeatedly proven liars. On the screen is a quote from Albert Pike having something to do with Freemasonry. According to Wikipedia, Pike wrote a book, Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in 1871. Flat-earthers and conspiracy theorists of all sorts often display a great deal of paranoia about Freemasons, I don't know why.
Anyway, he's got a quote that drones on for a while, but I think can be summed up in saying that high-ranking Freemasons are supposed to believe that Lucifer is god, but not tell the lower ranks. It's not found in the copy of the book at Project Gutenberg, however. His copy seems to come from Amazing Discoveries which looks like a site of more conspiracy theorists with a section on Prophecy News.
He moves on to Wernher von Braun. There's a photo of von Braun with Walt Disney, another 33rd degree Mason. Is that the only evidence he's bringing of either of them being Freemasons, that they are standing together? The photo is from when they met about Disney films on space exploration. Or is it that von Braun was a Nazi, Nazism is Satanism, Satanism is Freemasonry?
In an aside he says that we "lost the technology" to go back to the Moon. This is a standard flerf misinterpretation, we no longer build the rockets and spacecraft used in the Apollo missions. They think it's suspicious somehow. There's more technology on a phone today, he says - yes, but there's no Saturn V rocket at the bottom of it. He runs the clip of astronaut Don Petit saying "I'd go to the Moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore". As ever, flerfs suddenly trust NASA (remember the title of this video, NASA are liars?) when they say something they like. This is stuff I've seen in endless flerf videos, it's been dealt with. He changes the color and slows down Petit's voice as if that demonstrates anything.
Now he's back to von Braun and Disney, who he says are connected to Aleister Crowley. A quote from Gregory Garett says that Crowley, in addition to those two, was a member of "the NASA Dream Team". This should be good, seeing how Crowley died in 1947 and NASA was founded in 1958. There's a very small photo of the cover of a book in which it seems Garett wrote this, but it's too small to read.
Anyway, he's got a quote that drones on for a while, but I think can be summed up in saying that high-ranking Freemasons are supposed to believe that Lucifer is god, but not tell the lower ranks. It's not found in the copy of the book at Project Gutenberg, however. His copy seems to come from Amazing Discoveries which looks like a site of more conspiracy theorists with a section on Prophecy News.
He moves on to Wernher von Braun. There's a photo of von Braun with Walt Disney, another 33rd degree Mason. Is that the only evidence he's bringing of either of them being Freemasons, that they are standing together? The photo is from when they met about Disney films on space exploration. Or is it that von Braun was a Nazi, Nazism is Satanism, Satanism is Freemasonry?
In an aside he says that we "lost the technology" to go back to the Moon. This is a standard flerf misinterpretation, we no longer build the rockets and spacecraft used in the Apollo missions. They think it's suspicious somehow. There's more technology on a phone today, he says - yes, but there's no Saturn V rocket at the bottom of it. He runs the clip of astronaut Don Petit saying "I'd go to the Moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore". As ever, flerfs suddenly trust NASA (remember the title of this video, NASA are liars?) when they say something they like. This is stuff I've seen in endless flerf videos, it's been dealt with. He changes the color and slows down Petit's voice as if that demonstrates anything.
Now he's back to von Braun and Disney, who he says are connected to Aleister Crowley. A quote from Gregory Garett says that Crowley, in addition to those two, was a member of "the NASA Dream Team". This should be good, seeing how Crowley died in 1947 and NASA was founded in 1958. There's a very small photo of the cover of a book in which it seems Garett wrote this, but it's too small to read.
He goes on to talk about Crowley and bands, The Beatles, David Bowie, Led Zeppelin. Loads of them, all satanic. He's done a previous video about that. Is Paul still dead? He doesn't say people are satanists if they aren't, it's all researched.
Oh wait, I figured out what this guy is doing, he's got a blurb about that book that mentions Crowley, but doesn't say he was a member of NASA. Is he saying he is? Or that someone else had some connection to him? I think this and all the other blurbs are part of Google search results.
Oh wait, I figured out what this guy is doing, he's got a blurb about that book that mentions Crowley, but doesn't say he was a member of NASA. Is he saying he is? Or that someone else had some connection to him? I think this and all the other blurbs are part of Google search results.
Now he's talking about Jack Parsons, who was kicked out of Jet Propulsion Labs in 1944 due to following Crowley. And Parsons died in 1952, six years before NASA was founded. Another blurb from an also unnamed book by Gary Cartwright mentions, without context, Albert Einstein, Werher von Braun, Lyndon Johnson, Fidel Castro, Karl Marx, and Mao Zedong. I'm pretty sure that neither Castro, Marx, or Mao worked for NASA. I don't think he has any idea what he's even trying to insinuate here.
Now the blurb from the Parsons book is talking about "satanic-influenced mind-control experiment, supposedly run by the federal government" and then continues listing the names starting with Einstein. Now he's reading a quote about "not understanding oneness is satanic" and then there's an ellipses meaning text has been skipped over, and von Braun's name. He doesn't like evolution either and found another blurb mention evolution and von Braun. But all these blurbs say is that the same book discusses Crowley and NASA, or evolution and von Braun.
"They're laughing at you guys" - actually he's right here, he's hilarious.
"They're laughing at you guys" - actually he's right here, he's hilarious.
NASA, he claims comes from a word "nasatan". Once again there's a small blurb from some book, but not an entire quote, so I have no idea what this word is or even in what language. And NASA means "to deceive" in Hebrew (no, it does not, he didn't prepare, but I already blogged about it). And the red part of the NASA logo looks like a snake's tongue. What research skilz! Repeating something every other flerf says.
Now he discusses "how many astronauts are masons" And it's another of those book blurbs. Which lists eight. Googling how many people have been in space, one finds numbers in the 500's or 600's. But it's worse, Lewis and Clark were masons! A photo of masonic emblems is I suppose intended to be scary as he reads a few more astronauts' names. Most of the Apollo astronauts were masons (no evidence of this presented).
Now he discusses "how many astronauts are masons" And it's another of those book blurbs. Which lists eight. Googling how many people have been in space, one finds numbers in the 500's or 600's. But it's worse, Lewis and Clark were masons! A photo of masonic emblems is I suppose intended to be scary as he reads a few more astronauts' names. Most of the Apollo astronauts were masons (no evidence of this presented).
There's an Orange Lodge where he lives, and the word orange, when you "put it through a numerical calculator" (he means some sort of Gematria) has a value of 33. It's the only color in the world that does that! And there are 33 degrees of Scottish Rite Masonry! And one third of the angels fell from heaven with Lucifer! Jesus died at age 33!
Buzz Aldrin took a Masonic flat to the Moon! And brought it back. Except he didn't go! Norman, coordinate!
Buzz Aldrin took a Masonic flat to the Moon! And brought it back. Except he didn't go! Norman, coordinate!
Most famous people were masons. Area 51 - voice trails off. The (unnamed) head of NASA was "knocking around with Aleister Crowley". All famous songs are satanic. Masons are charitable because Satan gives them lots of money! He's getting bored. But he's still droning on. Freemasons freemasons freemasons. Charles Darwin was one. He wrote that people evolved from rock. His grandfather was, too. And half-wrote a book for him, all he had to do was go to the Galapagos Islands and look at some finches.
He doesn't watch TV, but he hears there's a series about Leonardo (da Vinchi) who was another one and "just propped up as this genius". And another Google search blurb says he was a freemason.
Now that we've established that all astronauts are masons (by finding partial quotes from books that say that some were, without seeing their evidence) And that masons are luciferians (with a quote from a paranoid website), if you disagree, please argue with him in the comments (all I see is one "really enjoy this" more comments from Craig McNeil from the FTFE channel on YouTube trying to set up a debate with him). He can keep going all day and there's another half hour of this.
French people are all masons. It all comes from there. And Scotland. The Jesuits are behind it. Please do not forget this.
Now he's going to show some clips where NASA admits they cannot leave low Earth orbit. But first, he's sorry that took so long. But he's going to repeat some of it again, after which it's going to become interesting. But not quite yet, he's going to compliment you for a while for watching this far. And tell you again that NASA lies, quod erat assertum. And rant a bit against theoretical physics, which means it isn't real.
Maybe we're getting near those clips, there's a diagram that correctly shows you that Low Earth Orbit (LEO) is indeed low. What a surprise! It shows the height of Yuri Gagarin's, Alan Shepard's and John Glenn's flights and the International Space Station (ISS) and Hubble Space Telescope. And the Moon is much further away (right again). So it looks like he's going to show some clips saying we currently have no spaceships for leaving LEO, therefore we never did, and never went to the Moon. But he's not going to tell us where to find these videos. Well no need, I'm sure everything on YouTube is as reliable as every book from which Google search can provide excerpts.
Well the first, from flat earth channel ODD TV, says, in that annoying slow playback that NASA has admitted that we can't go beyond LEO. Someone on the ISS says "right now we can only fly in earth orbit" (slow replay). Again, that doesn't mean we weren't able to during Apollo. This goes on for a while. It's just one repeated lie.
And the Buzz Aldrin cherry-pick. Aldrin was asked why we didn't go back to the Moon, and he's clearly explaining that we did go, but haven't been back. It's a longer excerpt than usual, so there are some new cherry-picks. He says that before Apollo, we hadn't sent people to the Moon. This is replayed in slow motion to give the impression that he's saying we never sent people to the Moon. Until today I had never watched this steaming pile of shit, but that is no longer true. Aldrin goes on to correctly describe how earlier Apollo missions first went around the Moon, and then practiced landing (Apollo 10 descended from lunar orbit but did not go all the way to the surface before returning to orbit). For no discernable reason "practice everything but landing" is repeated in slo-mo. And then Apollo 11 made an attempt (repeated in slo-mo) to land. And we did.
Now he's going to show some clips where NASA admits they cannot leave low Earth orbit. But first, he's sorry that took so long. But he's going to repeat some of it again, after which it's going to become interesting. But not quite yet, he's going to compliment you for a while for watching this far. And tell you again that NASA lies, quod erat assertum. And rant a bit against theoretical physics, which means it isn't real.
Maybe we're getting near those clips, there's a diagram that correctly shows you that Low Earth Orbit (LEO) is indeed low. What a surprise! It shows the height of Yuri Gagarin's, Alan Shepard's and John Glenn's flights and the International Space Station (ISS) and Hubble Space Telescope. And the Moon is much further away (right again). So it looks like he's going to show some clips saying we currently have no spaceships for leaving LEO, therefore we never did, and never went to the Moon. But he's not going to tell us where to find these videos. Well no need, I'm sure everything on YouTube is as reliable as every book from which Google search can provide excerpts.
Well the first, from flat earth channel ODD TV, says, in that annoying slow playback that NASA has admitted that we can't go beyond LEO. Someone on the ISS says "right now we can only fly in earth orbit" (slow replay). Again, that doesn't mean we weren't able to during Apollo. This goes on for a while. It's just one repeated lie.
And the Buzz Aldrin cherry-pick. Aldrin was asked why we didn't go back to the Moon, and he's clearly explaining that we did go, but haven't been back. It's a longer excerpt than usual, so there are some new cherry-picks. He says that before Apollo, we hadn't sent people to the Moon. This is replayed in slow motion to give the impression that he's saying we never sent people to the Moon. Until today I had never watched this steaming pile of shit, but that is no longer true. Aldrin goes on to correctly describe how earlier Apollo missions first went around the Moon, and then practiced landing (Apollo 10 descended from lunar orbit but did not go all the way to the surface before returning to orbit). For no discernable reason "practice everything but landing" is repeated in slo-mo. And then Apollo 11 made an attempt (repeated in slo-mo) to land. And we did.
Maybe repeat that in slo-mo? Instead, a picutre of Aldrin making the "OK" sign over his eye. I think that this is supposed to be something masonic but he spares us that.
So if they haven't been to the Moon ... This is another standard flerf tactic, assume the result you want, and then make up reasons why "they" are lying about it. Oh, the "hide God" nonsense. Aldrin took Communion on the Moon. The read from Genesis on Apollo 8. If they're trying to hide God, they're really doing a terrible job of it.
So if they haven't been to the Moon ... This is another standard flerf tactic, assume the result you want, and then make up reasons why "they" are lying about it. Oh, the "hide God" nonsense. Aldrin took Communion on the Moon. The read from Genesis on Apollo 8. If they're trying to hide God, they're really doing a terrible job of it.
But not everyone is in on the scam. The people making the parts are really doing that. Only the 33rd degree folks know this is cartoons for adults. Disney animators don't know, either (what they don't recognize their own work on TV?)
35 minutes in, he starts part three, where he's going to make the usual flerf lie that there are no real photos from space. And, this is another standard flerf tactic, ask why there isn't evidence, in this case a real-time video from launch to high enough orbit to show the whole globe. Which of course he would also reject as false.
And he then wants to zoom in on Australia and see people upside down. Has no idea what cameras are able to see at what distance. Maybe he'd also like NASA to read the license plate on his car and tell him where he left it.
NASA admits there are no real photos from space, says they have to be photoshopped. As "evidence" he shows yet another unsourced video about the 2002 "Blue Marble 2.0" image which is indeed a composite. And the video explains why this one image had to be photoshopped. But if something is called 2.0, there was probably a 1.0, and in this case that's the 1972 Blue Marble. And then there's the 1968 Earthrise, both of which were taken on film, using a camera.
He then takes a photo of a salt lamp, masks out all but a circle, and claims it looks like a planet.
Here's a map of Starbucks locations in Manhattan. Is much of the island covered completely with Starbucks? No, if the coffee shops were to scale, they would be hard to spot, on an island that is 13 miles wide at most. Same goes for satellites around a 7,917.5 mile planet.
Why don't they crash into one another, he asks? Why don't all those Starbucks merge into one giant one, with an exceedingly long line to get your coffee, but enough tables for everyone in the Tri-State area?
And 99% of the internet travels between continents via underwater cable. But did anyone tell him that all those satellites are for satellite internet? (What Is a Straw Man Argument?)
Satellites are not in space, they're on high altitude balloons. But I thought we could get into LEO? And then he says that some are in LEO, but only for the military (as usual, no evidence, not even a screenshot). And now, after saying there are some in space, he says there aren't any. There are no real pictures of satellites on the internet (he's lying). All satellite dishes point to the east (proof - one photo). Well it could be to the west, too. But never up.
NASA's livestream (I suppose from the ISS) is both made in a studio, but also never shows satellites. Well then why can't they bring a model of a satellite into the studio? And he lost the video, but he says he saw a hand adjust a lens from outside the ISS, and since he's presented no evidence up to now, why should he suddenly start? And there are bees in space (bits of debris, that don't look like bees at all). The internet has pulled all this down, well isn't that convenient? You won't find these videos (but somehow his video of these supposed bees is still there). There are bubbles in space (Eric Dubay lie #163). Astronauts are on harnesses, which he talks about while not showing you. Things disappear (because videos are shortened or frames get dropped)
Rockets don't go straight up, they are going into the ocean (no). The Red Hot Chili Peppers sung that the Moon landings were faked in a Hollywood studio (the actual lyric is “Space may be the final frontier but it’s made in a Hollywood basement” which isn't terrible from memory but can't he look shit up before lying about it?) And they're Satanists. And why are they telling you what you think is the truth? Because "it's part of their decree to tell the people what they're actually doing" (huh?)
Conclusion: this is all the usual flerf lies, misunderstandings, cherry-picking, and paranoia. He's discovered not one thing himself, every bit of this has been posted by other flerfs, some of which got enough views to make money, unlike him. And he thinks he's done research.
Conclusion: this is all the usual flerf lies, misunderstandings, cherry-picking, and paranoia. He's discovered not one thing himself, every bit of this has been posted by other flerfs, some of which got enough views to make money, unlike him. And he thinks he's done research.
1 comment:
Amazing takedown that the YouTuber will never appreciate nor comprehend. Best of luck to him on his child sex abuse court case.
Post a Comment